You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Messages output from gfix ought to be helpful and obvious. The way index faults are reported is neither, e.g. 'Index 7 is corrupt on page 354716 in table...' It turns out that "Index 7" refers to RDB$INDEX_ID in RDB$INDICES, which stores an internal smallint as enumerator of indices per relation. If this were not sufficiently unhelpful, the reported number is actually (RDB$INDEX_ID + 1). All of this is undocumented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Submitted by: @helebor
Votes: 1
Messages output from gfix ought to be helpful and obvious. The way index faults are reported is neither, e.g. 'Index 7 is corrupt on page 354716 in table...' It turns out that "Index 7" refers to RDB$INDEX_ID in RDB$INDICES, which stores an internal smallint as enumerator of indices per relation. If this were not sufficiently unhelpful, the reported number is actually (RDB$INDEX_ID + 1). All of this is undocumented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: