Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

INT64 datatype alias for Numeric(18,0) [CORE176] #503

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Jul 31, 2001 · 6 comments
Closed

INT64 datatype alias for Numeric(18,0) [CORE176] #503

firebird-automations opened this issue Jul 31, 2001 · 6 comments
Assignees
@dyemanov
Labels
component: engine fix-version: 1.5.0 priority: major type: improvement

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitted by: Sean Leyne (seanleyne)

SFID: 446206#⁠
Submitted By: seanleyne

It is a common request/question for new users -- how
do I create INT64 datatypes. Accordingly, we should
create an alias INT64 which would equate to NUMERIC
(18,0).
@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @dyemanov

status: Closed [ 6 ] => Reopened [ 4 ]

SF_ID: 446206 =>

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @dyemanov

status: Reopened [ 4 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

SF_ID: 446206 =>

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

issuetype: Bug [ 1 ] => Improvement [ 4 ]

SF_ID: 446206 =>

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

SF_ID: 446206 =>

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

Workflow: jira [ 10200 ] => Firebird [ 14422 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

QA Status: No test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dyemanov dyemanov

Labels
component: engine fix-version: 1.5.0 priority: major type: improvement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dyemanov @firebird-automations