New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ORDER BY works wrong with collate PT_PT [CORE202] #529
Comments
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2005-10-03 16:39 Adriano, could you please decide what's right and what's |
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2003-01-24 02:41 This is not a bug but a unicode collation implementation. |
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2001-10-12 17:10 same with Collation DE_DE. Please help in next release. |
Commented by: @asfernandes Syntax: |
Modified by: @asfernandesstatus: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ] resolution: Fixed [ 1 ] Fix Version: 2.1 [ 10041 ] SF_ID: 430509 => |
Commented by: Michael Brotr?ck (phreak1981) Where do I have to write: CREATE COLLATION PT_PT2 FOR ISO8859_1 FROM PT_PT 'SPECIALS-FIRST=1'; ? |
Commented by: @asfernandes In any tool you can run DDL commands. |
Commented by: @pcisar "Fix" confirmed for 2.1 Alpha 1. Test added. |
Commented by: @pcisar Reopened to update ticket information. |
Modified by: @pcisarFix Version: 2.1 Alpha 1 [ 10150 ] SF_ID: 430509 => Fix Version: 2.1.0 [ 10041 ] => |
Commented by: Michael Brotr?ck (phreak1981) CREATE COLLATION DE_DE2 FOR ISO8859_1 FROM DE_DE 'SPECIALS-FIRST=1'; Tested above with 2.1 Beta 1, looks really good for german collation! Thx a lot! |
Modified by: @pcisarWorkflow: jira [ 10226 ] => Firebird [ 14453 ] |
Modified by: @pavel-zotovQA Status: No test |
Modified by: @pavel-zotovQA Status: No test => Done successfully |
Submitted by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds)
Is related to CORE1221
Is related to QA62
SFID: 430509#
Submitted By: nobody
I have a table:
CREATE TABLE STOCKS
(
MNEN INTEGER NOT NULL,
ACTIVO VARCHAR(50) CHARACTER SET ISO8859_1
COLLATE PT_PT,
CONSTRAINT PK_STOCKS PRIMARY KEY (MNEN)
);
having the values
1, "B&A"
2, "BES"
3, "BCP"
4, "B&A Pref."
5, "Banif"
doing
SELECT ACTIVO FROM STOCKS ORDER BY ACTIVO
gives me:
B&A
Banif
B&A Pref.
BCP
BES
THAT IS WRONG!!!
If wanted i can give a test database i have (using it
on a site)
Pedro Costa
mailto:pbeck@ciberbit.pt
Commits: 72d74a2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: