You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that during the backport of solaris/amd64 port to 2.0.5, the
implementation id was added using the next available number in 2.0's
pag.cpp -- 29. In 2.1 and HEAD, sun/amd64 uses implementation ID of
32, and 29 is taken by linux/mipsel. Similar problem exists in
inf_pub.h: 2.1/HEAD have 74 for sun/amd64, but 2.0.5 uses 71, which is
taken for linux/mipsel in 2.1/HEAD.
This creates incompatibility in implementation IDs between 2.0.5 and
2.1/HEAD.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Submitted by: Damyan Ivanov (dam)
It seems that during the backport of solaris/amd64 port to 2.0.5, the
implementation id was added using the next available number in 2.0's
pag.cpp -- 29. In 2.1 and HEAD, sun/amd64 uses implementation ID of
32, and 29 is taken by linux/mipsel. Similar problem exists in
inf_pub.h: 2.1/HEAD have 74 for sun/amd64, but 2.0.5 uses 71, which is
taken for linux/mipsel in 2.1/HEAD.
This creates incompatibility in implementation IDs between 2.0.5 and
2.1/HEAD.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: