Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make words, non-reserved according to the SQL specification, non-reserved in our grammar [CORE2638] #3046

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Sep 23, 2009 · 6 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitted by: @AlexPeshkoff

The original code used plain yacc and declared all the grammatically conflicting keywords as reserved. Let's try o be as SQL compliant as possible, and avoid unneeded reserved words.

Commits: 6c1d6c2

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @AlexPeshkoff

assignee: Alexander Peshkov [ alexpeshkoff ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @AlexPeshkoff

A small list of non-reserved in SQL language words remain reserved in firebird. They are:
ADD DB_KEY GDSCODE INDEX KW_LONG PLAN POST_EVENT RETURNING_VALUES SQLCODE VARIABLE VIEW WEEK WHILE.

All the rest can be used now for any reasonable purporse.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @AlexPeshkoff

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

Fix Version: 2.5 RC1 [ 10362 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @dyemanov

summary: Make words, non-reserved according to SQL speciication, non-reserved in our grammar. => Make words, non-reserved according to the SQL specification, non-reserved in our grammar

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

QA Status: No test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants