Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: CORE-2990
Type: New Feature New Feature
Status: Open Open
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Vlad Khorsun
Reporter: Saulius Vabalas
Votes: 11
Watchers: 11

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Firebird Core

Physical (page-level) standby replication / page shipping

Created: 05/May/10 11:16 PM   Updated: 25/Jun/17 12:49 AM
Component/s: Engine
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Issue Links:

QA Status: Covered by another test(s)
Test Details: See test for CORE-2216

 Description  « Hide
Data replication/mirroring Option natively built into FB Engine allowing shipping and applying deltas on target DB's at page level for predefined tables and/or rule configurable record ranges. Critical for High Availability Databases

 All   Comments   Change History   Subversion Commits      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Dmitry Yemanov added a comment - 06/May/10 03:20 AM
I'd suggest to split this request into two separate ones: built-in page-level replication (new feature) and its table/record level customization (improvement).

Dimitry Sibiryakov added a comment - 06/May/10 08:04 AM
I'd suggest to discover nbackup instead of...

Dmitry Yemanov added a comment - 06/May/10 08:15 AM
NBackup doesn't allow you to have a warm standby, for example. IMO, this is a completely different tool, although with some technological similarities.

Saulius Vabalas added a comment - 06/May/10 05:05 PM
Have no problems splitting it into 2 items. Dmitry is right on the target. The goal is to have Hot Stand-By DB where Engine is performing replication real-time

Siva Ramanathan added a comment - 15/Mar/16 01:28 PM
This is critical for mass enterprise adoption.

Dmitry Yemanov added a comment - 13/Jun/17 05:03 PM - edited
Saulius Vabalas, please decide what to do with this ticket. We have CORE-2216 implemented for v4 Alpha 1, see its usage pattern inside the last comment. It's kinda asynchronous physical replication (standby). Built-in logical (record level) replication (both synchronous and asynchronous) will be added at the Beta stage. If you're satisfied with any of these solutions, this ticket should be closed. If you still see value in built-in page shipping (as synchronous physical replication), then let's leave it open and waiting for some other day.

Saulius Vabalas added a comment - 13/Jun/17 09:21 PM
nbackup improvement is a good addition, but I would like to keep this ticket open till the rest of this request is fulfilled.