Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal gds software consistency check (limbo impossible (184), file: vio.cpp line: 2036) [CORE3679] #4029

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Nov 30, 2011 · 13 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitted by: @doychin

Is replaced by CORE5528

I'm writing a program that converts some data from one data base into another one. I'm using multiple threads to convert more data at the same time. While testing the conversion program I got an error message that says:

GDS Exception. 335544333. internal gds software consistency check (limbo impossible (184), file: vio.cpp line: 2036)

The server code starts multiple transactions during the conversion.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @doychin

description: I'm writing a program that converts some data from one data base into another one. I'm using multiple threads to convert more data at the same time. While testing the conversion program i got an error message that says:

GDS Exception. 335544333. internal gds software consistency check (limbo impossible (184), file: vio.cpp line: 2036)

=>

I'm writing a program that converts some data from one data base into another one. I'm using multiple threads to convert more data at the same time. While testing the conversion program I got an error message that says:

GDS Exception. 335544333. internal gds software consistency check (limbo impossible (184), file: vio.cpp line: 2036)

The server code starts multiple transactions during the conversion.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @hvlad

I'm afraid it will be impossible to analyze the issue without reproducible test case

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @doychin

Few more things to add: The database file was from FB 2.1.2. I connected to it without backup/restore. Also FW was off and I'm using Classic server.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @doychin

After I got the error message I did backup/restore and after restarting conversion process there was no more error messages like this.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @hvlad

Are you using read-only and\or distributed transactions in conversion process ?

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @doychin

I'm using distributed transactions.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @hvlad

assignee: Vlad Khorsun [ hvlad ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @hvlad

Any chance that some distributed transaction was left in limbo state ?

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @doychin

I did backup without any problems after that. Also gfix did not report any problems with database.
I did the upgrade because I got the message about wrong page type (required 7 found 5) when using 2.1.2. After that putting server again under stress I got the message reported in this bug.
Today I repeated the whole conversion process without any problems but this is after doing backup/restore cycle.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @hvlad

It should be fixed at CORE5528 but i can't nor confirm nor disprove it

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @hvlad

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Incomplete [ 4 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @hvlad

Link: This issue is replaced by CORE5528 [ CORE5528 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants