New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
left outer join with sp is bad [CORE396] #740
Comments
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2001-12-06 18:15 Vasily, I haven't had time to run a test using your script (thanks, Could you please try the following SQL-92 formatted query: select pin.PROD_ID, pin.RAW_ID, rd.RAW_NAME,pin.RAW_MIN, |
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2001-12-06 09:57 Here is a test script distilled from the real data create database 'test.gdb' user 'sysdba' create table TestGroups CREATE TABLE TestDct ( CREATE TABLE TestTable ( INSERT INTO TESTGROUPS INSERT INTO TESTDCT INSERT INTO TESTTABLE (PROD_ID,RAW_ID,RAW_MIN,RAW_MAX) commit; set term ^; CREATE PROCEDURE "sp_Test" for select raw_group_id, parent, sequence_id, into :raw_group_id, :parent, :sequence_id, :raw_group_name set term ;^ commit; I try to execute following query select pin.PROD_ID, pin.RAW_ID, rd.RAW_NAME, and get the message |
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2001-12-06 06:02 You are mixing SQL-89 (...from Table1, Table2...) and SQL- |
Commented by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds) Date: 2001-11-28 07:51 what happens when you use correct JOIN syntax? select t1.x, ... , tn.x |
Modified by: @pcisarWorkflow: jira [ 10420 ] => Firebird [ 14693 ] |
Modified by: @pavel-zotovQA Status: No test |
Submitted by: bazilio (bazilio)
Assigned to: @ArnoBrinkman
SFID: 486370#
Submitted By: bazilio
When I try to execute query like that
select t1.x, ... , tn.x
from sp, t1, .., tn
left outer join tx on
http://tn.id = http://tx.id and
tx.PrimaryKey = 1111
where .....
I see bad results. Sometimes dependeds to query
complexity I get error message
"The cursor identified in the update or delete
statement is not positioned on a row.
no current record for fetch operation.", or get
incomplete result set, some of expected records
disappears.
I try to use explainment for bug 219525, but with no
results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: