Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gfix - wrong parsing of command line arguments [CORE442] #788

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Feb 27, 2006 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitted by: vlhr (vlhr)

SFID: 1439609#⁠
Submitted By: vlhr

When there is this command on command line

gfix -user username -password pwd -shut -force 0
database.gdb

gfix reports error:
incompatible switch combination, please retry,
specifiing option
plausible options are:
-activate
... etc.

And when there is this line:
gfix -shut -force 0 -user username -password pwd
database.gdb
command is successfully invoked. Only difference
between this two commands is that there is different
order of options "-shut -force 0". In the first example
it is after username and password options and in the
second example it is before username and password options.

It seems that gfix command badly parses command line
arguments.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

Workflow: jira [ 10466 ] => Firebird [ 14757 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: Claudio Valderrama C. (robocop)

I cannot reproduce it in FB 2.1 and FB2.5, so I'm going to mark it as fixed in FB2.1. Probably you were testing FB15.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: Claudio Valderrama C. (robocop)

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

Fix Version: 2.1.0 [ 10041 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pcisar

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

QA Status: No test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant