Make services API pass SQL role to server [CORE4662] #1601
Comments
Modified by: @AlexPeshkoffdescription: Just a few actions (user-management related) are capable to pass SQL role to server. Taking into an account that most of service tasks required SYSDBA privileges it made no big sense passing doing it in the past. Currently with more flexible access control passing role to he services manager is sometimes useful and should be possible. |
Modified by: @AlexPeshkoffdescription: Just a few actions (user-management related) are capable to pass SQL role to server. Taking into an account that most of service tasks required SYSDBA privileges it made no big sense passing doing it in the past. Currently with more flexible access control passing role to he services manager is sometimes useful and should be possible. => Just a few actions (user-management related) are capable to pass SQL role to server. Taking into an account that most of service tasks required SYSDBA privileges it made no big sense doing it in the past. Currently with more flexible access control passing role to he services manager is sometimes useful and should be possible. |
|
Commented by: @AlexPeshkoff Make it possible to pass isc_spb_sql_role_name item to services manager when attaching to it. |
Modified by: @AlexPeshkoffstatus: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ] resolution: Fixed [ 1 ] Fix Version: 3.0 Beta 2 [ 10586 ] |
Modified by: @pcisarstatus: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ] |
Submitted by: @AlexPeshkoff
Jira_subtask_inward CORE4648
Just a few actions (user-management related) are capable to pass SQL role to server. Taking into an account that most of service tasks required SYSDBA privileges it made no big sense doing it in the past. Currently with more flexible access control passing role to he services manager is sometimes useful and should be possible.
Commits: 8a9a2cb 187f86b FirebirdSQL/fbt-repository@c6526b8 FirebirdSQL/fbt-repository@a4a1656
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: