Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support auth_plugin_list dpb/spb item from application to client [CORE5860] #6120

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitted by: @mrotteveel

To specify the authentication plugin names, an application must create a config string with "AuthClient = <plugin-list>" (+ lines for other options). However there exists a specific DPB/SPB item isc_dpb_auth_plugin_list/isc_spb_auth_plugin_list that the client itself uses to communicate the plugin list to the server. However if an application populates that same item, it is ignored by the client.

Allow an application to use isc_dpb_auth_plugin_list/isc_spb_auth_plugin_list instead of having to create a config string.

See also discussion on firebird-devel titled "Passing plugin list to native client".

Commits: d9fabca dc06a58

====== Test Details ======

Can't understand how to overcome restrictions of fdb.connect() and fdb.Connection.
Sent letter to P.Cisar, 29.08.2018 10:14.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @AlexPeshkoff

assignee: Alexander Peshkov [ alexpeshkoff ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Commented by: @AlexPeshkoff

isc_dpb_auth_plugin_list (when present in DPB) has priority over plugins list provided in configuration, including configuration given in DPB

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @AlexPeshkoff

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

Fix Version: 4.0 Beta 1 [ 10750 ]

Fix Version: 3.0.4 [ 10863 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

QA Status: No test => Deferred

Test Details: Can't understand how to overcome restrictions of fdb.connect() and fdb.Connection.
Sent letter to P.Cisar, 29.08.2018 10:14.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment