Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: CORE-589
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Sean Leyne
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Firebird Core

Support explicit record lock/unlock

Created: 31/Jul/01 12:00 AM   Updated: 26/Jan/09 08:11 AM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 1.5.0

Time Tracking:
Not Specified

Issue Links:
Relate
 

SF_ID: 446255


 Description  « Hide
SFID: 446255#
Submitted By: seanleyne

?

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History   Version Control   Subversion Commits      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Alice F. Bird added a comment - 14/Jun/06 09:40 AM
Date: 2003-01-17 18:19
Sender: skidder
Logged In: YES
user_id=495356

Explicit locks are implemented in Firebird 1.5.
Explicit unlock doesn't fit transaction model well.
If you need Oracle DBMS_LOCK-like locking create an UDF for
it.

Alice F. Bird added a comment - 14/Jun/06 09:40 AM
Date: 2002-03-14 23:47
Sender: mweissenbacher
Logged In: YES
user_id=231195

record versioning is the most powerful feature in firebird/interbase. i
don't think it would do any good allowing explicit locking.

Alice F. Bird added a comment - 14/Jun/06 09:40 AM
Date: 2002-03-14 10:30
Sender: marcodugoni
Logged In: YES
user_id=113954

Sorry, I disagree with this one.
The automatic versioning system in IB/FB is powerful and
clean.
No need for explicit locking...