Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statement level read consistency in read-committed transactions [CORE5953] #2229

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitted by: @hvlad

Assigned to: @samofatov

Is related to CORE5954

The ticket is created for documentation purposes.

The more detailed description is at
doc\README.read_consistency.md

====== Test Details ======

Note: firebird.conf parameter ReadConsistency must be changed to non-default value 0 in order to compare different results of the same execution block (i.e. when we launch Tx in READ CONSISTENCY vs RECORD_VERSION mode).

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @hvlad

Link: This issue is related to CORE5954 [ CORE5954 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @hvlad

assignee: Nickolay Samofatov [ skidder ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @hvlad

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

Fix Version: 4.0 Beta 1 [ 10750 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

QA Status: No test => Done with caveats

Test Details: Note: firebird.conf parameter ReadConsistency must be changed to non-default value 0 in order to compare different results of the same execution block (i.e. when we launch Tx in READ CONSISTENCY vs RECORD_VERSION mode).

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Modified by: @pavel-zotov

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant