You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
John Frankland in firebird-devel and several other forums:
> What is the practice regarding digital signing of Firebird executables and installers etc.?
> Some releases have been signed with a "Firebird Inc" certificate in the past but it seems signing is not always done.
> Can signing be adopted as a policy?
Alex Peshkov in firebird-devel:
It's really funny. Sha256 checksums are provided for snapshot builds but not for releases.
Sean Leyne in firebird-devel:
SHA hashes are fine to validate downloads, but they are not the same as signing the install kits/executable.
Windows has increasingly made it difficult to install and/or run non-signed kits/executables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Submitted by: @helebor
John Frankland in firebird-devel and several other forums:
> What is the practice regarding digital signing of Firebird executables and installers etc.?
> Some releases have been signed with a "Firebird Inc" certificate in the past but it seems signing is not always done.
> Can signing be adopted as a policy?
Alex Peshkov in firebird-devel:
It's really funny. Sha256 checksums are provided for snapshot builds but not for releases.
Sean Leyne in firebird-devel:
SHA hashes are fine to validate downloads, but they are not the same as signing the install kits/executable.
Windows has increasingly made it difficult to install and/or run non-signed kits/executables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: