New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Materialized View [CORE822] #1208
Comments
Modified by: Alice F. Bird (firebirds)description: SFID: 1260233# I would vote for Materialized Views, that will help to Implementation of such query persistency could be => SFID: 1260233# I would vote for Materialized Views, that will help to Implementation of such query persistency could be |
Modified by: @pcisarWorkflow: jira [ 10846 ] => Firebird [ 15286 ] |
Commented by: Lucas Schatz (arvanus) Any news about this issue? |
Any news about this issue, maybe for Fb5 or Fb6? |
Submitted by: agjedrus (agjedrus)
Is duplicated by CORE2336
Votes: 10
SFID: 1260233#
Submitted By: agjedrus
I would vote for Materialized Views, that will help to
implement caching mechanizm for complicated reports.
Result of the timeconsuming query could be stored in
such view with some generated at runtime name, for
later usage eg. paging, sorting.... For sure such
snapshot has to be very fast lets say 100.000 (ID,
ROWNUM) < 1s
Implementation of such query persistency could be
more or lest like in Oracle.
I wanted to use in such purpose External File Table, but
table generated by EXECUTE STATEMENT is not visible
inside stored procedure that has created it. Another
workaround with "normal table" with sessionid is very
slow, inserting and deleting is timeconsuming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: