Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Functions (SQL functions) in FbSchema [DNET992] #909

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Dec 16, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Functions (SQL functions) in FbSchema [DNET992] #909

firebird-automations opened this issue Dec 16, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link

Submitted by: @cincuranet

Is related to DNET983

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @cincuranet

Link: This issue depends on DNET983 [ DNET983 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @cincuranet

Link: This issue is related to DNET983 [ DNET983 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @cincuranet

Link: This issue depends on DNET983 [ DNET983 ] =>

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @cincuranet

Fix Version: vNext [ 10982 ]

@cincuranet
Copy link
Member

I think I was little too terse with the description. :) What I see missing is function arguments and function privileges. Functions (both UDF, UDR and SQL) are there, as far as I can tell.

Did I miss something @FransBouma, @gonline?

@FransBouma
Copy link
Contributor

FransBouma commented Jul 27, 2021

I only support the reverse engineering of stored procs on firebird so looks good to me :)
For people who want to do that for functions: function arguments and return types is key I think. So names and types and ordinal position of the arguments, as well as the type returned by a function. Privileges might not be that useful, at least I can't see a use case for that, but if you can obtain that regardless, returning it wouldn't hurt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants