Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An issue with Timestamp [JDBC124] #164

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Aug 4, 2008 · 5 comments
Closed

An issue with Timestamp [JDBC124] #164

firebird-automations opened this issue Aug 4, 2008 · 5 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link

Submitted by: Sebastian Trebaczkiewicz (trebaczkiewicz)

Assigned to: Roman Rokytskyy (rrokytskyy)

I have very strange problem when passing Timestamps to the Firebird system.

I am calling procedure which searches for records based on the Timestamps range.

When I call it with the date that is in this year
Timestamp like 2008-04-03 11:00:00.514
2008-09-03 11:00:00.517
then it works

As soon as I will setup date to be in the past (in example)
2003-04-03 11:00:00.514
2008-09-03 11:00:00.517

It throws following exception

org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBSQLException: GDS Exception. 335544321. arithmetic exception, numeric overflow, or string truncation
No message for code 335544842 found.
null

at org\.firebirdsql\.jdbc\.FBCachedFetcher\.<init\>\(FBCachedFetcher\.java:126\)
at org\.firebirdsql\.jdbc\.FBResultSet\.<init\>\(FBResultSet\.java:113\)
at org\.firebirdsql\.jdbc\.AbstractStatement\.getCachedResultSet\(AbstractStatement\.java:568\)
at org\.firebirdsql\.jdbc\.AbstractCallableStatement\.cacheResultSet\(AbstractCallableStatement\.java:964\)
at org\.firebirdsql\.jdbc\.AbstractCallableStatement\.executeQuery\(AbstractCallableStatement\.java:257\)
@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Commented by: Roman Rokytskyy (rrokytskyy)

Please prepare a reproducable test case. The code that handled the timestamps is the same for all of them, therefore a test case is essential.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Commented by: Roman Rokytskyy (rrokytskyy)

Not yet reproduced issues cannot be classified as critical. In general please use the tracker for reproducable test cases, which should be attached to the ticket.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: Roman Rokytskyy (rrokytskyy)

priority: Critical [ 2 ] => Minor [ 4 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Commented by: @mrotteveel

Unable to reproduce this issue. Ticket can be reopened when a reproduction case is made available.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Cannot Reproduce [ 5 ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant