Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Firebird 4: check and correct precision reported in various metadata for FLOAT/REAL/DOUBLE PRECISION (for FB4+ only) [JDBC591] #622

Closed
firebird-automations opened this issue Aug 11, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link

Submitted by: @mrotteveel

Jira_subtask_inward JDBC466
Relate to CORE6109

With the implementation of FLOAT(p) with 1 <= p <= 24 being FLOAT (or REAL), and 25 <= p <= 53 being DOUBLE PRECISION from CORE6109, the precision for binary floating point types should probably be fixed for FB4+ to be reported with NUM_PREC_RADIX = 2 and the right values.

This would be in the various DatabaseMetaData methods, ResultSetMetaData, ParameterMetaData, etc.

Commits: 0fb5a02

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Fix Version: Jaybird 4.0.0-beta-2 [ 10902 ]

Fix Version: Jaybird 4 [ 10441 ]

description: With the implementation of FLOAT(p) with 1 <= p <= 24 being FLOAT (or REAL), and 25 <= p <= 53 being DOUBLE PRECISION from CORE6109, the precision for binary floating point types should probably be fixed for FB4+ to be reported with NUM_PREC_RADIX = 2 and the right values.

This would be in the various DatabaseMetaData methods, ResultSetMetaData, ParameterMetaData, etc.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Component: JDBC driver [ 10053 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue relate to CORE6109 [ CORE6109 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

status: Open [ 1 ] => Resolved [ 5 ]

resolution: Fixed [ 1 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

status: Resolved [ 5 ] => Closed [ 6 ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants